Lease Agreements Arbitration

The Supreme Court, after reviewing the provisions of the Bombay Rent Control Act and, in particular, section 28, which imposes and prohibits the jurisdiction of certain courts[4], established that the Bombay Rent Control Act is welfare legislation and that the scheme of the Act shows the transfer of exclusive jurisdiction to certain jurisdictions and was therefore not open to the parties, remove from the legal mandate contracts that required litigation by special courts. In this context, the Supreme Court declared that the arbitration clause contained in the agreement was ineffective. Does this raise an arbitration clause in a rental agreement? No no. Tenants can sign their right to a copy by signing a separate agreement. This is considered completely independent of a lease. Recent amendments to the Arbitration Act in 2015, which inserted Section 29A and other provisions, opened up the possibility for individuals to enjoy the benefits of arbitration, which until now was considered an area of large companies with deep pockets for siege fees and legal batteries. Landlords, tenants and brokers can take the initiative by inserting arbitration clauses into lease agreements. The government and the judiciary should also take the lead in creating panels of experienced lawyers and retired judges who will be able to benefit from timely alternative dispute resolution. Such measures will go a long way in alleviating the problems of landlords and tenants and in fulfilling the constitutional mission of justice for all, not for a few. Schorr Law is experienced in the settlement of real estate disputes and regularly handles disputes before the courts and arbitration proceedings. To inquire about your case, please contact us today at or (310) 954-1877. The respondent`s predecessor had entered into a deed of lease with the applicant dated August 31, 2010 for a period of three years with effect from October 7, 2010.

The lease expired and no new deeds were subsequently performed between the parties. In addition, the respondent filed a complaint with the Saket District Court in New Delhi against the complainant seeking the evacuation of the premises in question by the complainant and asserting certain unpaid rent arrears and the granting of a permanent injunction against the complainant. Along with the rejection of University Village`s application for review, the California Supreme Court also rejected University Village`s request to no longer publish the Court of Appeals` opinion. Accordingly, in light of this new jurisprudence, it is recommended that older persons` communities review their arbitration agreements. While arbitration clauses can no longer hold residents` housing disputes, arbitration in the event of a care and service dispute is likely to remain enforceable. The arbitration clauses should be amended to clarify that they cover the rights related to the care and services offered under the contract, but not the rights of landlords and tenants covered by the Civil Code. While the use of the legal language requires that the words “licensor” and “licensee” be used instead of “lessor” or “tenant”, we will use the latter for convenience….

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Education for Revolution